Clarifying response options
I see that the style guidelines suggest being concise and friendly. So, I’m thinking I’ll paraphrase the meaning first. Then I can offer the user some options: I could ask if they want background information on the people and the team, or if they’d like to verify or corroborate with sources. I’ll make sure to enumerate those options clearly so the user can choose what they prefer. Sounds like a solid plan!
大意是：徐亮对“李明卸任北京国安总经理”这事感到意外，他觉得其中有些决定并非李明个人能拍板，可能是更高层面的安排。
需要我做什么？
- 事件背景梳理（人名、职务、时间线）
- 当事人简介（徐亮、李明、北京国安）
- 可能原因与影响的分析
- 帮你找权威来源与原话出处（需要我在线检索）